Before you knee-jerk that I'm just another fanboi. "Ivory towers"? That's a bit condescending, isn't it? Sounds a bit more like I don't like the messenger shoot-um to me. However, apparently, a large portion does visit Youtube and or also watch Twitch as platforms for their means of in-game information. It's a known fact that there is a very small percentage of the player base that visit the forums, an even smaller percentage visit Reddit. You and a few others here keep repeating that it's the prominent CCs fault that has caused all of the outrages. More income generated.īut, as you know and have stated, human nature leads many to expect the best and rage at anything less. On the flipside, if WG published percentages I would expect them to sell many more of the Mega crates because the odds are better. If they had stated that many would still buy the crates - and still complain - but the mechanic would be fully disclosed and no recourse to mitigation available. That wasn't called out nor specified in any of WG announcements. The issue is that WG did not say you will 100% get one of the crappy ships before you had a chance at the better ships. I see many post responses where the forumites (?) post the explanatory text to irrational rants. I am certain some will complain but fairly confident that forum veterans won't back them. If WG clearly explains it then all the attempted leveraging in the world won't make a difference. Is it really? Or is it about the shortlist mechanics giving them ships which prominent CCs have declared from their ivory towers to be garbage? I'm half convinced that people wanting the odds published is the slippery slope to trying to leverage 1/ x odds into 1/ x guarantee. If putting the info out there doesn't change player behaviour, or potentially makes it worse, they may as well not do it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |